* review-stack 1/4: code (37 files, +3217/-3958)
Review-and-land stack for synap5e/feat/asset-record-content-split, generated by review-stack.py. Once approved,
merges DOWN into the layer below (a fast-forward); only the bottom layer
squash-merges into the real base. See ~/adocs/review-stack.md.
Rule: path not under tests-unit/ or tests/
Question: Is the logic change right?
Source tip: 7007d18582
Merge-base: 783545f689
* review-stack 2/4: tests-removed (24 files, +274/-8220)
Review-and-land stack for synap5e/feat/asset-record-content-split, generated by review-stack.py. Once approved,
merges DOWN into the layer below (a fast-forward); only the bottom layer
squash-merges into the real base. See ~/adocs/review-stack.md.
Rule: test file deleted, or modified with deleted/(added+deleted) >= 0.9
Question: For each dropped assertion: obsolete by a ruling, or covered by a tests-new test?
Source tip: 7007d18582
Merge-base: 783545f689
* review-stack 3/4: tests-changed (13 files, +1043/-1218)
Review-and-land stack for synap5e/feat/asset-record-content-split, generated by review-stack.py. Once approved,
merges DOWN into the layer below (a fast-forward); only the bottom layer
squash-merges into the real base. See ~/adocs/review-stack.md.
Rule: remaining modified test files (incl. conftest.py / helpers)
Question: Did the edits weaken an existing check?
Source tip: 7007d18582
Merge-base: 783545f689
* review-stack 4/4: tests-new (46 files, +8601/-0)
Review-and-land stack for synap5e/feat/asset-record-content-split, generated by review-stack.py. Once approved,
merges DOWN into the layer below (a fast-forward); only the bottom layer
squash-merges into the real base. See ~/adocs/review-stack.md.
Rule: test file added
Question: Is the code layer well covered?
Source tip: 7007d18582
Merge-base: 783545f689
* review-stack 5/6: code (13 files, +351/-104)
Review-and-land stack for synap5e/feat/assets-di, generated by review-stack.py. Once approved,
merges DOWN into the layer below (a fast-forward); only the bottom layer
squash-merges into the real base. See ~/adocs/review-stack.md.
Rule: path not under tests-unit/ or tests/
Question: Is the logic change right?
Source tip: eca2c74bff
Merge-base: 20d59d2a5f
* review-stack 6/6: tests (8 files, +753/-238)
Review-and-land stack for synap5e/feat/assets-di, generated by review-stack.py. Once approved,
merges DOWN into the layer below (a fast-forward); only the bottom layer
squash-merges into the real base. See ~/adocs/review-stack.md.
Rule: every changed file under tests-unit/ or tests/ (added, modified, or deleted)
Question: Is the code layer well covered, and did any edit weaken an existing check?
Source tip: eca2c74bff
Merge-base: 20d59d2a5f
* review-stack 7/8: ported-fixes (42 files, +1361/-180)
Review-and-land stack for synap5e/feat/assets-di-v2, generated by
review-stack.py conventions (hand-built continuation layer; see the PR body).
Once approved, merges DOWN into the layer below (a fast-forward); only the
bottom layer squash-merges into the real base. See ~/adocs/review-stack.md.
Rule: the 11 base-branch fix/docs commits 595cd6e4..94d7185b cherry-picked across the DI refactor (7efdd1d7 excluded, superseded by layer 8)
Question: was each base fix ported faithfully across the DI refactor?
Source tip: 6841881069284803b902b4a9e33bdcda13126771
Merge-base: 7fdfb40f4b
* review-stack 8/8: defensive-parity (4 files, +36/-3)
Review-and-land stack for synap5e/feat/assets-di-v2, generated by
review-stack.py conventions (hand-built continuation layer; see the PR body).
Once approved, merges DOWN into the layer below (a fast-forward); only the
bottom layer squash-merges into the real base. See ~/adocs/review-stack.md.
Rule: match-or-improve master's dependency defenses — NoAssets selection when DB deps unavailable (7efdd1d7's outcome via the DI seam), requirements warning before assets imports, blake3 in the guarded dependency set
Question: does each degradation path now match or improve master's behavior?
Source tip: ebc2cfeebc
Merge-base: 7fdfb40f4b
* fix(assets): only discard content rows this operation actually inserted
CR-9: Enumerated all six create_content call sites. Only scanner seeding and the three ingest registration paths track IDs for failure cleanup.
* fix(assets): reject hash-only uploads with FEATURE_DISABLED when hashing is off
CodeRabbit finding CR-2: reject hash-only multipart uploads before create_from_hash when hashing is disabled.
* fix(assets): seed persists the stat it verified
CR-7: persist the fresh seed-time restat instead of walk-time spec values.
* fix(assets): route database lock failures to the lock guidance
CR-16: route file-lock startup failures through the existing lock guidance and exit path.
* fix(assets): drop the inaccurate temp-cleanup claim from the shutdown warning
References CR-10.
* fix(assets): walk the output root after execution so undeclared outputs register promptly
Custom nodes that write files into the output directory without declaring
them in output_ui only became assets when the next full walk happened - a
frontend GET /object_info or a restart. Headless and API-only sessions never
trigger either, so those files never converged into the asset database.
The post-execution hook now requests a FULL scan of the output root instead of
an enrich-only pass. The seeder's pending-request queue was generalised from
enrich-specific to carrying a scan phase, so the request starts immediately
when the seeder is idle and coalesces (escalating to FULL on a phase mismatch)
when a scan is already running. queue_output_enrichment is renamed to
queue_output_scan across the protocol, the NoAssets no-op and the call site.
References FIX-6.
* chore(assets): remove seeder paths orphaned by the output-scan change
45c2f96e rerouted both former enrich call sites to start()/enqueue_scan(),
leaving two seeder methods that look live but are not. Review round F2
raised this along with four smaller items; the user's disposition was to
fix all six here.
- Delete start_enrich: zero callers repo-wide after 45c2f96e.
- Delete enqueue_enrich: no production callers; its ~18 call sites in
tests/test_asset_seeder.py move to enqueue_scan(phase=ScanPhase.ENRICH)
with their semantics unchanged. The deletion forces the half-done class
renames (TestEnqueueEnrich* -> TestEnqueueScan*, consistent with the
already-renamed TestPendingScanDrain) and restores the module docstring
that was dropped rather than reworded.
- Document at manager.queue_output_scan that ScanPhase.FULL per debounce
window is the deliberate, user-ratified trade, so it is not optimised
back to ENRICH without revisiting the decision.
- Document that SeedAssetSpec.size_bytes/mtime_ns are walk-time
diagnostics only - production persists the seed-time restat since CR-7.
- Export create_content_reporting_insert from the queries facade and fold
scanner.py's direct-module import into the existing facade block.
- Harden test_queue_output_scan_does_not_duplicate_declared_output against
a vacuous pass: it now asserts the seeder finished without errors and
that an undeclared sibling written into the same directory WAS
registered by the same scan, proving the walk actually ran.
No production behaviour changes beyond the two deletions.
References F2-cleanup.
* chore: comment cleanup
Comment-Gate: 18 quarantined
* fix(assets): preserve pause across the seeder's pending-scan drain
pause() runs before every prompt, while pending-scan enqueue and resume only run inside the debounced gc-interval gate. If the active scan finishes just after the next prompt's pause, its finally block resets the seeder to idle and the pending drain starts a replacement with the run gate open, so resume becomes a no-op.
Capture pausedness under the lock before resetting to idle, then start the drained scan already paused. Setting the state and gate before launching the thread avoids the start-then-reclear window and lets resume release the existing scan checkpoints.
Ultraworked with [Sisyphus](https://github.com/code-yeongyu/oh-my-openagent)
Co-authored-by: Sisyphus <clio-agent@sisyphuslabs.ai>
* test(assets): pin job_id absence for scan-discovered assets
Owner ruling, recorded 2026-09-03 in the stack-9-hardening planning notepad: scan-discovered assets — including undeclared outputs found by the post-execution walk — carry job_id = None, always; only emission-time registration (output_ui declaration) attributes a job; attributing walk finds to the most recent prompt would be a temporal-correlation guess that is wrong exactly when prompts interleave; None is honest provenance. Do NOT add proximity-based attribution heuristics to the scanner. Ratified against Jacob Segal's cross-job-attribution concern (2026-09-08 review meeting) — a wrongly-attributed asset could mean one user's cloud job sees another user's asset.
Ultraworked with [Sisyphus](https://github.com/code-yeongyu/oh-my-openagent)
Co-authored-by: Sisyphus <clio-agent@sisyphuslabs.ai>
* [review-stack 10/10] assets-tests (#16218)
* test(execution): run the battery with assets enabled and assert asset-system health at teardown
* test(execution): cover list-shaped outputs registering assets
Ultraworked with [Sisyphus](https://github.com/code-yeongyu/oh-my-openagent)
Co-authored-by: Sisyphus <clio-agent@sisyphuslabs.ai>
---------
Co-authored-by: Sisyphus <clio-agent@sisyphuslabs.ai>
* [review-stack 11/11] review-fixes (#16261)
* fix(assets): only exit on database file-lock timeout when assets are enabled
* test(assets): pin live_contents_under_prefixes path-filtering semantics
* perf(assets): push live-content prefix filtering into SQL
* test(assets): declare per-entry intent in the path-prefix corpus
* test(assets): normalize POSIX-literal path expectations for Windows
* test(assets): force observable stat changes and close-before-mutate on Windows-sensitive rewrites
* test(assets): force an observable mtime change in the hash-mode split test
---------
Co-authored-by: Sisyphus <clio-agent@sisyphuslabs.ai>
Co-authored-by: guill <jacob.e.segal@gmail.com>
* [Partner Nodes] feat(Tripo): migrate all nodes to the v3 API and add the Smart Segment node
Signed-off-by: bigcat88 <bigcat88@icloud.com>
* [Partner Nodes] feat(Tripo): deprecate Text to Model, Image to Model and Texture model in favour of V2 nodes without the retired widgets
Signed-off-by: bigcat88 <bigcat88@icloud.com>
* [Partner Nodes] fix(Tripo): report the mixamo retarget limitation for rigs whose v3 task echo carries no model version
Signed-off-by: bigcat88 <bigcat88@icloud.com>
* [Partner Nodes] fix(Tripo): keep the Smart Segment widgets inside the source options so the frontend can build the node
Signed-off-by: bigcat88 <bigcat88@icloud.com>
* [Partner Nodes] fix(Tripo): correct the Retarget and Smart Segment tooltips to what Tripo accepts
Signed-off-by: bigcat88 <bigcat88@icloud.com>
---------
Signed-off-by: bigcat88 <bigcat88@icloud.com>
AMD+windows sets an unusually low maximum GPU virtual memory quota
compared to other plaforms. For reference, the hardware limits on
XT9060 are 128TB. On Nvidia RTX3060 it is 1TB. On nvidia RTX5090
it is 128TB.
Bump this into the same league, but keep it to a modest 4TB pending
further usage case need + testing going even higher to the hardware
limits.
Simon Pinfold